LR may be DAM software, but it also contains what is arguably the best Raw converter available, ACR. ![]() Apparently most of them prefer to have the two together under one roof. I know you like to shoot motor sports, if I asked you to show me all the photos you took at a particular venue during the last five years, how long would it take you to have them all on screen so I could look through them and choose the one I like best? The simple fact is many photographers with large collections need a fast way to find things and if LR did not exist they would need to use DAM software like Photo Mechanic or Thumbs Plus and then go from there to PSCS for ACR. And it has absolutely nothing to do with asset management. There is no other Raw converter that can do this other than LR/ACR. The speed problems have been in other areas entirely.įor a few people writing an XMP is a way of transferring data to another XMP capable application. What are you talking about? Very few people bother to write XMP files with LR because for most people it is an unneeded duplication of the catalog and I have never seen a single complaint about the speed at which data is written to the catalog. Not for me, I'll manage my own assets thank you very much and I don't need Adobe interfering. The software is too concerned about where all this uploaded data is going to be stored. ![]() The root problem stems from the fact that LR was designed from the very outset as a digital asset management program that has a few bells and whistles added. Well, that does not sound like a cure to me. ![]() I have been a long time complainer about exactly this issue with LR generally and users of the later versions have been insisting that it has been cured.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |